The reply from Luke. I think I should talk to him and suggest he talks also to ESB.What do you think? Stephen
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Luke Ibbetson, Vodafone" <luke.ibbetson@vodafone.com> Subject: RE: Techworks/IOTSF - IN CONFIDENCE Date: 30 January 2026 at 12:05:32 GMT To: Stephen Pattison <stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com>
Dear Stephen
CONFIDENTIAL
Thank you for your note, I’m glad you contacted me.
I’d like to put your mind at rest regarding TechWorks continued commitment to IOTSF and to serving its membership in the best possible way. It would not be appropriate for me to discuss the circumstances around John’s exit from the organisation, but I regret the unfortunate way this has been messaged to the IOTSF Steering Board.
I can reassure you that TechWorks is financially stable and being actively managed to remain so. In common with all other trade associations, we are operating in a challenging economic environment and need to remain sharp, competitive, and fully engaged with the different communities which form our foundation. After reflecting on events and developments over the past year, I am making some leadership changes designed to improve efficiency of the organisation. I’d be more than happy to take you through once complete. As Executive Chair of TechWorks (and company director), I am taking personal accountability for management and support of the leadership team as we make these changes, which will strengthen the company’s ability to execute its mission and deliver meaningful value to our entire membership.
I fully agree with the need for well structured, well thought through comms regarding John’s departure. This is being addressed as a matter of urgency. In the meantime, I’d personally appreciate your support in handling this matter with discretion – I recognise the unnecessary damage it may cause if handled poorly. John has been an outstanding asset to the organisation over many years and commands tremendous respect.
I’d be very happy to discuss further if you’d like to have a call next week.
Kind regards, Luke +44 7775 683111
From: Stephen Pattison <stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com <mailto:stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com>> Sent: 29 January 2026 16:06 To: Luke Ibbetson, Vodafone <luke.ibbetson@vodafone.com <mailto:luke.ibbetson@vodafone.com>> Subject: Techworks/IOTSF
You don't often get email from stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com <mailto:stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com>. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> External Email: Don’t click links or open attachments unless you trust the sender. Unsure? Please use the Report button. Dear Luke,
I am writing on behalf of the members of the IOTSF Steering Board about recent developments at Techworks and how they impact the work of IOTSF.
At our meeting on 28 January, John Moor announced he would be leaving IOTSF and Techworks in order primarily to relieve the sudden financial pressures on Techworks. All of the Board Members were shocked and disappointed. John’s role in IOTSF has been crucial to its success for many years.
A number of questions arise:
- How has this disastrous situation come about? Why wasn’t the financial position of Techworks monitored by the Board more closely and more competently? - The decision to release John casts doubt on the Techwork Board’s commitment to IOTSF and its work going forward. How can IOTSF members be assured of Techworks’s continued support of it? And of much better financial management in the future?
In our discussion members stressed the unique value IOTSF provides as a forum for bringing together industrial, commercial, academic, regulatory and policy viewpoints. We strongly believe there is a demand for an organisation like this, whether as part of Techworks or not.
Apart from the fundamental questions above, the Board is worried about the public handling of John’s departure and its significance. There is a risk that members may leave the organisation if this is not done carefully. We need as a minimum a well thought out comms strategy.
The Board would welcome a session with you in the next couple of weeks to hear your views on these issues and discuss them with you.
Many Thanks
Stephen
Stephen Pattison Chair IOTSF ESB
C2 General
Yes, I agree. The ESB and the membership have a right to understand the plans going forward. As I mentioned, I am outside the details/ongoing discussions and could only speak to the intent (as per my statement). For the avoidance of doubt, I agreed with the TechWorks CEO (Charlie) that I would notify the ESB and we should respond as necessary. I outlined what was to be said and also stated that it was likely that reassurances would be needed as a result given the sudden nature of the situation. This is now the reality (I.e. as was likely and discussed). Sent from Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef> ________________________________ From: Stephen Pattison <stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com> Sent: Friday, January 30, 2026 6:28:23 PM To: esb@iotsfmm.org <esb@iotsfmm.org>; John Moor <john.moor@techworks.org.uk> Subject: Fwd: Techworks/IOTSF - IN CONFIDENCE The reply from Luke. I think I should talk to him and suggest he talks also to ESB.What do you think? Stephen Begin forwarded message: From: "Luke Ibbetson, Vodafone" <luke.ibbetson@vodafone.com> Subject: RE: Techworks/IOTSF - IN CONFIDENCE Date: 30 January 2026 at 12:05:32 GMT To: Stephen Pattison <stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com> Dear Stephen CONFIDENTIAL Thank you for your note, I’m glad you contacted me. I’d like to put your mind at rest regarding TechWorks continued commitment to IOTSF and to serving its membership in the best possible way. It would not be appropriate for me to discuss the circumstances around John’s exit from the organisation, but I regret the unfortunate way this has been messaged to the IOTSF Steering Board. I can reassure you that TechWorks is financially stable and being actively managed to remain so. In common with all other trade associations, we are operating in a challenging economic environment and need to remain sharp, competitive, and fully engaged with the different communities which form our foundation. After reflecting on events and developments over the past year, I am making some leadership changes designed to improve efficiency of the organisation. I’d be more than happy to take you through once complete. As Executive Chair of TechWorks (and company director), I am taking personal accountability for management and support of the leadership team as we make these changes, which will strengthen the company’s ability to execute its mission and deliver meaningful value to our entire membership. I fully agree with the need for well structured, well thought through comms regarding John’s departure. This is being addressed as a matter of urgency. In the meantime, I’d personally appreciate your support in handling this matter with discretion – I recognise the unnecessary damage it may cause if handled poorly. John has been an outstanding asset to the organisation over many years and commands tremendous respect. I’d be very happy to discuss further if you’d like to have a call next week. Kind regards, Luke +44 7775 683111 From: Stephen Pattison <stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com<mailto:stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com>> Sent: 29 January 2026 16:06 To: Luke Ibbetson, Vodafone <luke.ibbetson@vodafone.com<mailto:luke.ibbetson@vodafone.com>> Subject: Techworks/IOTSF You don't often get email from stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com<mailto:stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com>. Learn why this is important<https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> External Email: Don’t click links or open attachments unless you trust the sender. Unsure? Please use the Report button. Dear Luke, I am writing on behalf of the members of the IOTSF Steering Board about recent developments at Techworks and how they impact the work of IOTSF. At our meeting on 28 January, John Moor announced he would be leaving IOTSF and Techworks in order primarily to relieve the sudden financial pressures on Techworks. All of the Board Members were shocked and disappointed. John’s role in IOTSF has been crucial to its success for many years. A number of questions arise: - How has this disastrous situation come about? Why wasn’t the financial position of Techworks monitored by the Board more closely and more competently? - The decision to release John casts doubt on the Techwork Board’s commitment to IOTSF and its work going forward. How can IOTSF members be assured of Techworks’s continued support of it? And of much better financial management in the future? In our discussion members stressed the unique value IOTSF provides as a forum for bringing together industrial, commercial, academic, regulatory and policy viewpoints. We strongly believe there is a demand for an organisation like this, whether as part of Techworks or not. Apart from the fundamental questions above, the Board is worried about the public handling of John’s departure and its significance. There is a risk that members may leave the organisation if this is not done carefully. We need as a minimum a well thought out comms strategy. The Board would welcome a session with you in the next couple of weeks to hear your views on these issues and discuss them with you. Many Thanks Stephen Stephen Pattison Chair IOTSF ESB C2 General
Hi, @ John - thanks for your feedback and support, in what must be challenging circumstances. @ Stephen, for some reason I didn't receive your feedback below but would agree that a call with Luke ought to be a matter or urgency, so that we have a clear understanding and of needs be a holding position until the formal communication is made. Is that something you want to do as a one to one, or as you intimated on the call on Thursday afternoon, to have a sub group of the ESB join a call - which has the benefit that whilst you are speaking others are able to listen and form a position from a more observational stance. Happy to support you in that regard, if you want another pair of ESB "ears" on such a call. I hope that is helpful, have a great weekend. Kind regards Richard On 30/01/2026 19:31, John Moor wrote:
Yes, I agree.
The ESB and the membership have a right to understand the plans going forward. As I mentioned, I am outside the details/ongoing discussions and could only speak to the intent (as per my statement).
For the avoidance of doubt, I agreed with the TechWorks CEO (Charlie) that I would notify the ESB and we should respond as necessary. I outlined what was to be said and also stated that it was likely that reassurances would be needed as a result given the sudden nature of the situation. This is now the reality (I.e. as was likely and discussed).
Sent from Outlook for iOS <https://aka.ms/o0ukef> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Stephen Pattison <stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com> *Sent:* Friday, January 30, 2026 6:28:23 PM *To:* esb@iotsfmm.org <esb@iotsfmm.org>; John Moor <john.moor@techworks.org.uk> *Subject:* Fwd: Techworks/IOTSF - IN CONFIDENCE The reply from Luke. I think I should talk to him and suggest he talks also to ESB.What do you think?
Stephen
Begin forwarded message:
*From: *"Luke Ibbetson, Vodafone" <luke.ibbetson@vodafone.com> *Subject: **RE: Techworks/IOTSF - IN CONFIDENCE* *Date: *30 January 2026 at 12:05:32 GMT *To: *Stephen Pattison <stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com>
Dear Stephen CONFIDENTIAL Thank you for your note, I’m glad you contacted me. I’d like to put your mind at rest regarding TechWorks continued commitment to IOTSF and to serving its membership in the best possible way. It would not be appropriate for me to discuss the circumstances around John’s exit from the organisation, but I regret the unfortunate way this has been messaged to the IOTSF Steering Board. I can reassure you that TechWorks is financially stable and being actively managed to remain so. In common with all other trade associations, we are operating in a challenging economic environment and need to remain sharp, competitive, and fully engaged with the different communities which form our foundation. After reflecting on events and developments over the past year, I am making some leadership changes designed to improve efficiency of the organisation. I’d be more than happy to take you through once complete. As Executive Chair of TechWorks (and company director), I am taking personal accountability for management and support of the leadership team as we make these changes, which will strengthen the company’s ability to execute its mission and deliver meaningful value to our entire membership. I fully agree with the need for well structured, well thought through comms regarding John’s departure. This is being addressed as a matter of urgency. In the meantime, I’d personally appreciate your support in handling this matter with discretion – I recognise the unnecessary damage it may cause if handled poorly. John has been an outstanding asset to the organisation over many years and commands tremendous respect. I’d be very happy to discuss further if you’d like to have a call next week. Kind regards, Luke +44 7775 683111 *From:*Stephen Pattison <stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com> *Sent:*29 January 2026 16:06 *To:*Luke Ibbetson, Vodafone <luke.ibbetson@vodafone.com> *Subject:*Techworks/IOTSF
You don't often get email fromstephen.d.pattison@icloud.com.Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
*External Email:*Don’t click links or open attachments unless you trust the sender. Unsure? Please use the*_Report button_*.
Dear Luke,
I am writing on behalf of the members of the IOTSF Steering Board about recent developments at Techworks and how they impact the work of IOTSF.
At our meeting on 28 January, John Moor announced he would be leaving IOTSF and Techworks in order primarily to relieve the sudden financial pressures on Techworks. All of the Board Members were shocked and disappointed. John’s role in IOTSF has been crucial to its success for many years.
A number of questions arise:
- How has this disastrous situation come about? Why wasn’t the financial position of Techworks monitored by the Board more closely and more competently? - The decision to release John casts doubt on the Techwork Board’s commitment to IOTSF and its work going forward. How can IOTSF members be assured of Techworks’s continued support of it? And of much better financial management in the future?
In our discussion members stressed the unique value IOTSF provides as a forum for bringing together industrial, commercial, academic, regulatory and policy viewpoints. We strongly believe there is a demand for an organisation like this, whether as part of Techworks or not.
Apart from the fundamental questions above, the Board is worried about the public handling of John’s departure and its significance. There is a risk that members may leave the organisation if this is not done carefully. We need as a minimum a well thought out comms strategy.
The Board would welcome a session with you in the next couple of weeks to hear your views on these issues and discuss them with you.
Many Thanks Stephen Stephen Pattison Chair IOTSF ESB
C2 General
_______________________________________________ ESB mailing list --esb@iotsfmm.org To unsubscribe send an email toesb-leave@iotsfmm.org
My 2p A call is essential Stephen, I think you are best placed to determine if this is a 1:1 or larger call. These are the things at the forefront of my mind The plan: Esb members, individually and collectively, invest their time, resources and most importantly reputation into IOTSF activity. We need to understand the resourcing situation, and the vision. a. How are we going to support existing activity. (how to we avert a car crash) b. What is the vision going forward (why should we continue to invest our efforts) Resources What is the honest situation Techworks has been running a £100k deficit for past few years (public accounts) - not great... https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/SC170059/... If they are trimming staff, then there must have been a further dip. Dip in revenue? Increase in spend ? How bad is it? What is the trend? Can it be shifted? Hard numbers? Has the board trimmed the right resources? A non profit collective (ie Techworks) is a delicate balance of individual relationships. Especially one as long lasting and niche as Techworks Are they confident they are pulling out the right Jenga brick. And do they understand the consequences if they have got it wrong (tower falls down) I think these are legitimate questions for the entire board I also want to make sure the board understands we (nquiringminds) have secured approx. £900k over the past few years for Techworks. We are defacto (probably) the single biggest financial stakeholder We want to understand what happened Contrariwise can can demonstrably help, but we need facts. Immediate dilemma The last point is specific to NQM, but maybe not relevant for the immediate call. Currently we (NQM) hold all the essential IP on both the TAIBOM specs https://aibom.org/ and the assurance framework publishing pipeline.(https://af.iotsf.org/) These assets need to be transferred into an organization representing the collective good This was supposed to be Techworks. Clearly, it would be highly irresponsible to do the transfer until we understand Techworks viability But we need to move fast, so either we can resolve the key concerns OR we need to find another home for these assets. But as a say, just my 2p Cheers Nick On Fri, 30 Jan 2026 at 18:28, Stephen Pattison <stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com [mailto:stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com]> wrote: The reply from Luke. I think I should talk to him and suggest he talks also to ESB.What do you think? Stephen Begin forwarded message: From: "Luke Ibbetson, Vodafone" <luke.ibbetson@vodafone.com [mailto:luke.ibbetson@vodafone.com]> Subject: RE: Techworks/IOTSF - IN CONFIDENCE Date: 30 January 2026 at 12:05:32 GMT To: Stephen Pattison <stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com [mailto:stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com]> Dear Stephen CONFIDENTIAL Thank you for your note, I’m glad you contacted me. I’d like to put your mind at rest regarding TechWorks continued commitment to IOTSF and to serving its membership in the best possible way. It would not be appropriate for me to discuss the circumstances around John’s exit from the organisation, but I regret the unfortunate way this has been messaged to the IOTSF Steering Board. I can reassure you that TechWorks is financially stable and being actively managed to remain so. In common with all other trade associations, we are operating in a challenging economic environment and need to remain sharp, competitive, and fully engaged with the different communities which form our foundation. After reflecting on events and developments over the past year, I am making some leadership changes designed to improve efficiency of the organisation. I’d be more than happy to take you through once complete. As Executive Chair of TechWorks (and company director), I am taking personal accountability for management and support of the leadership team as we make these changes, which will strengthen the company’s ability to execute its mission and deliver meaningful value to our entire membership. I fully agree with the need for well structured, well thought through comms regarding John’s departure. This is being addressed as a matter of urgency. In the meantime, I’d personally appreciate your support in handling this matter with discretion – I recognise the unnecessary damage it may cause if handled poorly. John has been an outstanding asset to the organisation over many years and commands tremendous respect. I’d be very happy to discuss further if you’d like to have a call next week. Kind regards, Luke +44 7775 683111 From: Stephen Pattison <stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com [mailto:stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com]> Sent: 29 January 2026 16:06 To: Luke Ibbetson, Vodafone <luke.ibbetson@vodafone.com [mailto:luke.ibbetson@vodafone.com]> Subject: Techworks/IOTSF You don't often get email from stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com [mailto:stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com]. Learn why this is important [https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification] External Email: Don’t click links or open attachments unless you trust the sender. Unsure? Please use the Report button. Dear Luke, I am writing on behalf of the members of the IOTSF Steering Board about recent developments at Techworks and how they impact the work of IOTSF. At our meeting on 28 January, John Moor announced he would be leaving IOTSF and Techworks in order primarily to relieve the sudden financial pressures on Techworks. All of the Board Members were shocked and disappointed. John’s role in IOTSF has been crucial to its success for many years. A number of questions arise: - How has this disastrous situation come about? Why wasn’t the financial position of Techworks monitored by the Board more closely and more competently? - The decision to release John casts doubt on the Techwork Board’s commitment to IOTSF and its work going forward. How can IOTSF members be assured of Techworks’s continued support of it? And of much better financial management in the future? In our discussion members stressed the unique value IOTSF provides as a forum for bringing together industrial, commercial, academic, regulatory and policy viewpoints. We strongly believe there is a demand for an organisation like this, whether as part of Techworks or not. Apart from the fundamental questions above, the Board is worried about the public handling of John’s departure and its significance. There is a risk that members may leave the organisation if this is not done carefully. We need as a minimum a well thought out comms strategy. The Board would welcome a session with you in the next couple of weeks to hear your views on these issues and discuss them with you. Many Thanks Stephen Stephen Pattison Chair IOTSF ESB C2 General _______________________________________________ ESB mailing list -- esb@iotsfmm.org [mailto:esb@iotsfmm.org] To unsubscribe send an email to esb-leave@iotsfmm.org [mailto:esb-leave@iotsfmm.org] -- Nick Allott CEO nquiringminds Visiting Professor University of Southampton BSc. PhD. FBCS, FIAP. FRSA +44 (0) 7714145711 | nick@nqminds.com [mailto:nick@nqminds.com] | skype: nallott | @nqminds Engineering Centre, University Pkwy, Southampton SO16 7PT Company Number: 7452630, VAT No: 103 0537 70 www.nqminds.com [http://www.nqminds.com]
Thanks Nick, I have messaged Luke to say I don’t mind talking to him but this is no substitute for a call with ESB. I am waiting for him to get back. PS: Charles Sturman also offered to talk one on one: I told him I didn’t think it sensible to open a second channel on this. A but harsh but….. Stephen
On 4 Feb 2026, at 07:39, Nick Allott <nick@nquiringminds.com> wrote:
My 2p
A call is essential
Stephen, I think you are best placed to determine if this is a 1:1 or larger call.
These are the things at the forefront of my mind
The plan: Esb members, individually and collectively, invest their time, resources and most importantly reputation into IOTSF activity. We need to understand the resourcing situation, and the vision. a. How are we going to support existing activity. (how to we avert a car crash) b. What is the vision going forward (why should we continue to invest our efforts)
Resources What is the honest situation Techworks has been running a £100k deficit for past few years (public accounts) - not great... https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/SC170059/... If they are trimming staff, then there must have been a further dip. Dip in revenue? Increase in spend ? How bad is it? What is the trend? Can it be shifted? Hard numbers? Has the board trimmed the right resources? A non profit collective (ie Techworks) is a delicate balance of individual relationships. Especially one as long lasting and niche as Techworks Are they confident they are pulling out the right Jenga brick. And do they understand the consequences if they have got it wrong (tower falls down) I think these are legitimate questions for the entire board
I also want to make sure the board understands we (nquiringminds) have secured approx. £900k over the past few years for Techworks. We are defacto (probably) the single biggest financial stakeholder We want to understand what happened Contrariwise can can demonstrably help, but we need facts.
Immediate dilemma The last point is specific to NQM, but maybe not relevant for the immediate call. Currently we (NQM) hold all the essential IP on both the TAIBOM specs https://aibom.org/ and the assurance framework publishing pipeline.(https://af.iotsf.org/) These assets need to be transferred into an organization representing the collective good This was supposed to be Techworks. Clearly, it would be highly irresponsible to do the transfer until we understand Techworks viability But we need to move fast, so either we can resolve the key concerns OR we need to find another home for these assets.
But as a say, just my 2p
Cheers
Nick
On Fri, 30 Jan 2026 at 18:28, Stephen Pattison <stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com <mailto:stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com>> wrote:
The reply from Luke. I think I should talk to him and suggest he talks also to ESB.What do you think?
Stephen
Begin forwarded message:
From: "Luke Ibbetson, Vodafone" <luke.ibbetson@vodafone.com <mailto:luke.ibbetson@vodafone.com>> Subject: RE: Techworks/IOTSF - IN CONFIDENCE Date: 30 January 2026 at 12:05:32 GMT To: Stephen Pattison <stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com <mailto:stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com>>
Dear Stephen
CONFIDENTIAL
Thank you for your note, I’m glad you contacted me.
I’d like to put your mind at rest regarding TechWorks continued commitment to IOTSF and to serving its membership in the best possible way. It would not be appropriate for me to discuss the circumstances around John’s exit from the organisation, but I regret the unfortunate way this has been messaged to the IOTSF Steering Board.
I can reassure you that TechWorks is financially stable and being actively managed to remain so. In common with all other trade associations, we are operating in a challenging economic environment and need to remain sharp, competitive, and fully engaged with the different communities which form our foundation. After reflecting on events and developments over the past year, I am making some leadership changes designed to improve efficiency of the organisation. I’d be more than happy to take you through once complete. As Executive Chair of TechWorks (and company director), I am taking personal accountability for management and support of the leadership team as we make these changes, which will strengthen the company’s ability to execute its mission and deliver meaningful value to our entire membership.
I fully agree with the need for well structured, well thought through comms regarding John’s departure. This is being addressed as a matter of urgency. In the meantime, I’d personally appreciate your support in handling this matter with discretion – I recognise the unnecessary damage it may cause if handled poorly. John has been an outstanding asset to the organisation over many years and commands tremendous respect.
I’d be very happy to discuss further if you’d like to have a call next week.
Kind regards, Luke +44 7775 683111
From: Stephen Pattison <stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com <mailto:stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com>> Sent: 29 January 2026 16:06 To: Luke Ibbetson, Vodafone <luke.ibbetson@vodafone.com <mailto:luke.ibbetson@vodafone.com>> Subject: Techworks/IOTSF
You don't often get email from stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com <mailto:stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com>. Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> External Email: Don’t click links or open attachments unless you trust the sender. Unsure? Please use the Report button. Dear Luke,
I am writing on behalf of the members of the IOTSF Steering Board about recent developments at Techworks and how they impact the work of IOTSF.
At our meeting on 28 January, John Moor announced he would be leaving IOTSF and Techworks in order primarily to relieve the sudden financial pressures on Techworks. All of the Board Members were shocked and disappointed. John’s role in IOTSF has been crucial to its success for many years.
A number of questions arise:
- How has this disastrous situation come about? Why wasn’t the financial position of Techworks monitored by the Board more closely and more competently? - The decision to release John casts doubt on the Techwork Board’s commitment to IOTSF and its work going forward. How can IOTSF members be assured of Techworks’s continued support of it? And of much better financial management in the future?
In our discussion members stressed the unique value IOTSF provides as a forum for bringing together industrial, commercial, academic, regulatory and policy viewpoints. We strongly believe there is a demand for an organisation like this, whether as part of Techworks or not.
Apart from the fundamental questions above, the Board is worried about the public handling of John’s departure and its significance. There is a risk that members may leave the organisation if this is not done carefully. We need as a minimum a well thought out comms strategy.
The Board would welcome a session with you in the next couple of weeks to hear your views on these issues and discuss them with you.
Many Thanks
Stephen
Stephen Pattison Chair IOTSF ESB
C2 General
_______________________________________________ ESB mailing list -- esb@iotsfmm.org <mailto:esb@iotsfmm.org> To unsubscribe send an email to esb-leave@iotsfmm.org <mailto:esb-leave@iotsfmm.org>
--
Nick Allott CEO nquiringminds Visiting Professor University of Southampton BSc. PhD. FBCS, FIAP. FRSA +44 (0) 7714145711 | nick@nqminds.com <mailto:nick@nqminds.com> | skype: nallott | @nqminds
Engineering Centre, University Pkwy, Southampton SO16 7PT Company Number: 7452630, VAT No: 103 0537 70 www.nqminds.com <http://www.nqminds.com/> _______________________________________________ ESB mailing list -- esb@iotsfmm.org To unsubscribe send an email to esb-leave@iotsfmm.org
Hi All, I’m so sorry that I was unable to get back home in time for the call. John, Stephen, Nick & everyone else I really appreciate this response. I also agree with Nick’s suggestion, observation and questions. Kind Regards, Sarb From: Nick Allott <nick@nquiringminds.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2026 7:39 AM To: Stephen Pattison <stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com> Cc: esb@iotsfmm.org; John Moor <john.moor@techworks.org.uk> Subject: [Esb] Re: Fwd: Techworks/IOTSF - IN CONFIDENCE My 2p A call is essential Stephen, I think you are best placed to determine if this is a 1:1 or larger call. These are the things at the forefront of my mind The plan: Esb members, individually and collectively, invest their time, resources and most importantly reputation into IOTSF activity. We need to understand the resourcing situation, and the vision. a. How are we going to support existing activity. (how to we avert a car crash) b. What is the vision going forward (why should we continue to invest our efforts) Resources What is the honest situation Techworks has been running a £100k deficit for past few years (public accounts) - not great... https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/SC170059/... If they are trimming staff, then there must have been a further dip. Dip in revenue? Increase in spend ? How bad is it? What is the trend? Can it be shifted? Hard numbers? Has the board trimmed the right resources? A non profit collective (ie Techworks) is a delicate balance of individual relationships. Especially one as long lasting and niche as Techworks Are they confident they are pulling out the right Jenga brick. And do they understand the consequences if they have got it wrong (tower falls down) I think these are legitimate questions for the entire board I also want to make sure the board understands we (nquiringminds) have secured approx. £900k over the past few years for Techworks. We are defacto (probably) the single biggest financial stakeholder We want to understand what happened Contrariwise can can demonstrably help, but we need facts. Immediate dilemma The last point is specific to NQM, but maybe not relevant for the immediate call. Currently we (NQM) hold all the essential IP on both the TAIBOM specs https://aibom.org/ and the assurance framework publishing pipeline.(https://af.iotsf.org/) These assets need to be transferred into an organization representing the collective good This was supposed to be Techworks. Clearly, it would be highly irresponsible to do the transfer until we understand Techworks viability But we need to move fast, so either we can resolve the key concerns OR we need to find another home for these assets. But as a say, just my 2p Cheers Nick On Fri, 30 Jan 2026 at 18:28, Stephen Pattison <stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com <mailto:stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com> > wrote: The reply from Luke. I think I should talk to him and suggest he talks also to ESB.What do you think? Stephen Begin forwarded message: From: "Luke Ibbetson, Vodafone" <luke.ibbetson@vodafone.com <mailto:luke.ibbetson@vodafone.com> > Subject: RE: Techworks/IOTSF - IN CONFIDENCE Date: 30 January 2026 at 12:05:32 GMT To: Stephen Pattison <stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com <mailto:stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com> > Dear Stephen CONFIDENTIAL Thank you for your note, I’m glad you contacted me. I’d like to put your mind at rest regarding TechWorks continued commitment to IOTSF and to serving its membership in the best possible way. It would not be appropriate for me to discuss the circumstances around John’s exit from the organisation, but I regret the unfortunate way this has been messaged to the IOTSF Steering Board. I can reassure you that TechWorks is financially stable and being actively managed to remain so. In common with all other trade associations, we are operating in a challenging economic environment and need to remain sharp, competitive, and fully engaged with the different communities which form our foundation. After reflecting on events and developments over the past year, I am making some leadership changes designed to improve efficiency of the organisation. I’d be more than happy to take you through once complete. As Executive Chair of TechWorks (and company director), I am taking personal accountability for management and support of the leadership team as we make these changes, which will strengthen the company’s ability to execute its mission and deliver meaningful value to our entire membership. I fully agree with the need for well structured, well thought through comms regarding John’s departure. This is being addressed as a matter of urgency. In the meantime, I’d personally appreciate your support in handling this matter with discretion – I recognise the unnecessary damage it may cause if handled poorly. John has been an outstanding asset to the organisation over many years and commands tremendous respect. I’d be very happy to discuss further if you’d like to have a call next week. Kind regards, Luke +44 7775 683111 From: Stephen Pattison <stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com <mailto:stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com> > Sent: 29 January 2026 16:06 To: Luke Ibbetson, Vodafone <luke.ibbetson@vodafone.com <mailto:luke.ibbetson@vodafone.com> > Subject: Techworks/IOTSF You don't often get email from stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com <mailto:stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com> . Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification> External Email: Don’t click links or open attachments unless you trust the sender. Unsure? Please use the Report button. Dear Luke, I am writing on behalf of the members of the IOTSF Steering Board about recent developments at Techworks and how they impact the work of IOTSF. At our meeting on 28 January, John Moor announced he would be leaving IOTSF and Techworks in order primarily to relieve the sudden financial pressures on Techworks. All of the Board Members were shocked and disappointed. John’s role in IOTSF has been crucial to its success for many years. A number of questions arise: - How has this disastrous situation come about? Why wasn’t the financial position of Techworks monitored by the Board more closely and more competently? - The decision to release John casts doubt on the Techwork Board’s commitment to IOTSF and its work going forward. How can IOTSF members be assured of Techworks’s continued support of it? And of much better financial management in the future? In our discussion members stressed the unique value IOTSF provides as a forum for bringing together industrial, commercial, academic, regulatory and policy viewpoints. We strongly believe there is a demand for an organisation like this, whether as part of Techworks or not. Apart from the fundamental questions above, the Board is worried about the public handling of John’s departure and its significance. There is a risk that members may leave the organisation if this is not done carefully. We need as a minimum a well thought out comms strategy. The Board would welcome a session with you in the next couple of weeks to hear your views on these issues and discuss them with you. Many Thanks Stephen Stephen Pattison Chair IOTSF ESB C2 General _______________________________________________ ESB mailing list -- esb@iotsfmm.org <mailto:esb@iotsfmm.org> To unsubscribe send an email to esb-leave@iotsfmm.org <mailto:esb-leave@iotsfmm.org> -- Nick Allott CEO nquiringminds Visiting Professor University of Southampton BSc. PhD. FBCS, FIAP. FRSA +44 (0) 7714145711 | nick@nqminds.com <mailto:nick@nqminds.com> | skype: nallott | @nqminds Engineering Centre, University Pkwy, Southampton SO16 7PT Company Number: 7452630, VAT No: 103 0537 70 <http://www.nqminds.com> www.nqminds.com
Hi All, Might I suggest that rather than having a 1:1 call, that we should encourage a brief focussed call with the ESB, with whoever is taking over the executive responsibility for the IoTSF, i.e. who will be Chris's executive sponsor. This will give whoever is taking over an opportunity to lay out their plan and for us to give feedback. This saves Stephen having to relay such messaging to us and will give us an opportunity to find out: 1. If there has been a financial tightening, how is the recovery plan progressing? 2. What is the formal public messaging on John's departure, in the event any of us are asked? 3. Did the conference make a surplus this year, or did it incur a loss like it did in I think 2024? 4. From a members perspective, what impact is there, what impact does the new financial constraints place in the annual conference this year? 5. Are there plans to increase revenue, e.g. increased membership/sponsorship? 6. What should the ESB being doing to support Chris in developing the current work plan to improve the membership value proposition? 7. What can the ESB do to assist securing further funding, as NQM have done? If at the end of such an ESB call there is still a feeling of insufficient information on the vision etc, that Stephen has a call with Luke? As Nick says, my 2 cents... I hope that is helpful. Kind regards Richard On 04/02/2026 07:39, Nick Allott wrote:
My 2p
A call is essential
Stephen, I think you are best placed to determine if this is a 1:1 or larger call.
These are the things at the forefront of my mind
*The plan:* Esb members, individually and collectively, invest their time, resources and most importantly reputation into IOTSF activity. We need to understand the resourcing situation, and the vision. a. How are we going to support existing activity. (how to we avert a car crash) b. What is the vision going forward (why should we continue to invest our efforts)
*Resources* What is the honest situation Techworks has been running a £100k deficit for past few years (public accounts) - not great... https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/SC170059/... If they are trimming staff, then there must have been a further dip. Dip in revenue? Increase in spend ? How bad is it? What is the trend? Can it be shifted? Hard numbers? Has the board trimmed the right resources? A non profit collective (ie Techworks) is a delicate balance of individual relationships. Especially one as long lasting and niche as Techworks Are they confident they are pulling out the right Jenga brick. And do they understand the consequences if they have got it wrong (tower falls down) I think these are legitimate questions for the entire board
I also want to make sure the board understands we (nquiringminds) have secured approx. £900k over the past few years for Techworks. We are defacto (probably) the single biggest financial stakeholder We want to understand what happened Contrariwise can can demonstrably help, but we need facts.
*Immediate dilemma* The last point is specific to NQM, but maybe not relevant for the immediate call. Currently we (NQM) hold all the essential IP on both the TAIBOM specs https://aibom.org/ and the assurance framework publishing pipeline.(https://af.iotsf.org/) These assets need to be transferred into an organization representing the collective good This was supposed to be Techworks. Clearly, it would be highly irresponsible to do the transfer until we understand Techworks viability But we need to move fast, so either we can resolve the key concerns OR we need to find another home for these assets.
But as a say, just my 2p
Cheers
Nick
On Fri, 30 Jan 2026 at 18:28, Stephen Pattison <stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com> wrote:
The reply from Luke. I think I should talk to him and suggest he talks also to ESB.What do you think?
Stephen
Begin forwarded message:
*From: *"Luke Ibbetson, Vodafone" <luke.ibbetson@vodafone.com> *Subject: **RE: Techworks/IOTSF - IN CONFIDENCE* *Date: *30 January 2026 at 12:05:32 GMT *To: *Stephen Pattison <stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com>
Dear Stephen CONFIDENTIAL Thank you for your note, I’m glad you contacted me. I’d like to put your mind at rest regarding TechWorks continued commitment to IOTSF and to serving its membership in the best possible way. It would not be appropriate for me to discuss the circumstances around John’s exit from the organisation, but I regret the unfortunate way this has been messaged to the IOTSF Steering Board. I can reassure you that TechWorks is financially stable and being actively managed to remain so. In common with all other trade associations, we are operating in a challenging economic environment and need to remain sharp, competitive, and fully engaged with the different communities which form our foundation. After reflecting on events and developments over the past year, I am making some leadership changes designed to improve efficiency of the organisation. I’d be more than happy to take you through once complete. As Executive Chair of TechWorks (and company director), I am taking personal accountability for management and support of the leadership team as we make these changes, which will strengthen the company’s ability to execute its mission and deliver meaningful value to our entire membership. I fully agree with the need for well structured, well thought through comms regarding John’s departure. This is being addressed as a matter of urgency. In the meantime, I’d personally appreciate your support in handling this matter with discretion – I recognise the unnecessary damage it may cause if handled poorly. John has been an outstanding asset to the organisation over many years and commands tremendous respect. I’d be very happy to discuss further if you’d like to have a call next week. Kind regards, Luke +44 7775 683111 *From:*Stephen Pattison <stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com> *Sent:*29 January 2026 16:06 *To:*Luke Ibbetson, Vodafone <luke.ibbetson@vodafone.com> *Subject:*Techworks/IOTSF
You don't often get email fromstephen.d.pattison@icloud.com.Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
*External Email:*Don’t click links or open attachments unless you trust the sender. Unsure? Please use the*_Report button_*.
Dear Luke,
I am writing on behalf of the members of the IOTSF Steering Board about recent developments at Techworks and how they impact the work of IOTSF.
At our meeting on 28 January, John Moor announced he would be leaving IOTSF and Techworks in order primarily to relieve the sudden financial pressures on Techworks. All of the Board Members were shocked and disappointed. John’s role in IOTSF has been crucial to its success for many years.
A number of questions arise:
- How has this disastrous situation come about? Why wasn’t the financial position of Techworks monitored by the Board more closely and more competently? - The decision to release John casts doubt on the Techwork Board’s commitment to IOTSF and its work going forward. How can IOTSF members be assured of Techworks’s continued support of it? And of much better financial management in the future?
In our discussion members stressed the unique value IOTSF provides as a forum for bringing together industrial, commercial, academic, regulatory and policy viewpoints. We strongly believe there is a demand for an organisation like this, whether as part of Techworks or not.
Apart from the fundamental questions above, the Board is worried about the public handling of John’s departure and its significance. There is a risk that members may leave the organisation if this is not done carefully. We need as a minimum a well thought out comms strategy.
The Board would welcome a session with you in the next couple of weeks to hear your views on these issues and discuss them with you.
Many Thanks Stephen Stephen Pattison Chair IOTSF ESB
C2 General
_______________________________________________ ESB mailing list -- esb@iotsfmm.org To unsubscribe send an email to esb-leave@iotsfmm.org
--
Nick Allott
CEO nquiringminds
Visiting Professor University of Southampton
BSc. PhD. FBCS, FIAP. FRSA
+44 (0) 7714145711 | nick@nqminds.com | skype: nallott | @nqminds
Engineering Centre, University Pkwy, Southampton SO16 7PT
Company Number: 7452630, VAT No: 103 0537 70 www.nqminds.com <http://www.nqminds.com>
_______________________________________________ ESB mailing list --esb@iotsfmm.org To unsubscribe send an email toesb-leave@iotsfmm.org
Hi again, My apologies, one more topic: * The foundation has managed to survive the last 10 years of the pre-regulatory environment on cybersecurity, with the next two years about to see wholesale change with the arrival of the RED and CRA, amongst others. * With the impending arrival of such regulations there are a lot of OEMs and SMEs who really need guidance in this new [compliance] environment. This represents a real opportunity for the IoTSF to support industry and to widen its membership - in the past cybersecurity was something interesting that companies dealt with when their products got hacked. Now they are in a world, where they have to "do" product security for compliance or face potentially significant fines. Hence an organisation like the IoTSF can have real value if it helps them reduce the cost of their organisations route to compliance... KR Richard On 05/02/2026 07:27, Richard Marshall wrote:
Hi All,
Might I suggest that rather than having a 1:1 call, that we should encourage a brief focussed call with the ESB, with whoever is taking over the executive responsibility for the IoTSF, i.e. who will be Chris's executive sponsor.
This will give whoever is taking over an opportunity to lay out their plan and for us to give feedback.
This saves Stephen having to relay such messaging to us and will give us an opportunity to find out:
1. If there has been a financial tightening, how is the recovery plan progressing? 2. What is the formal public messaging on John's departure, in the event any of us are asked? 3. Did the conference make a surplus this year, or did it incur a loss like it did in I think 2024? 4. From a members perspective, what impact is there, what impact does the new financial constraints place in the annual conference this year? 5. Are there plans to increase revenue, e.g. increased membership/sponsorship? 6. What should the ESB being doing to support Chris in developing the current work plan to improve the membership value proposition? 7. What can the ESB do to assist securing further funding, as NQM have done?
If at the end of such an ESB call there is still a feeling of insufficient information on the vision etc, that Stephen has a call with Luke?
As Nick says, my 2 cents...
I hope that is helpful.
Kind regards
Richard
On 04/02/2026 07:39, Nick Allott wrote:
My 2p
A call is essential
Stephen, I think you are best placed to determine if this is a 1:1 or larger call.
These are the things at the forefront of my mind
*The plan:* Esb members, individually and collectively, invest their time, resources and most importantly reputation into IOTSF activity. We need to understand the resourcing situation, and the vision. a. How are we going to support existing activity. (how to we avert a car crash) b. What is the vision going forward (why should we continue to invest our efforts)
*Resources* What is the honest situation Techworks has been running a £100k deficit for past few years (public accounts) - not great... https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/SC170059/... If they are trimming staff, then there must have been a further dip. Dip in revenue? Increase in spend ? How bad is it? What is the trend? Can it be shifted? Hard numbers? Has the board trimmed the right resources? A non profit collective (ie Techworks) is a delicate balance of individual relationships. Especially one as long lasting and niche as Techworks Are they confident they are pulling out the right Jenga brick. And do they understand the consequences if they have got it wrong (tower falls down) I think these are legitimate questions for the entire board
I also want to make sure the board understands we (nquiringminds) have secured approx. £900k over the past few years for Techworks. We are defacto (probably) the single biggest financial stakeholder We want to understand what happened Contrariwise can can demonstrably help, but we need facts.
*Immediate dilemma* The last point is specific to NQM, but maybe not relevant for the immediate call. Currently we (NQM) hold all the essential IP on both the TAIBOM specs https://aibom.org/ and the assurance framework publishing pipeline.(https://af.iotsf.org/) These assets need to be transferred into an organization representing the collective good This was supposed to be Techworks. Clearly, it would be highly irresponsible to do the transfer until we understand Techworks viability But we need to move fast, so either we can resolve the key concerns OR we need to find another home for these assets.
But as a say, just my 2p
Cheers
Nick
On Fri, 30 Jan 2026 at 18:28, Stephen Pattison <stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com> wrote:
The reply from Luke. I think I should talk to him and suggest he talks also to ESB.What do you think?
Stephen
Begin forwarded message:
*From: *"Luke Ibbetson, Vodafone" <luke.ibbetson@vodafone.com> *Subject: **RE: Techworks/IOTSF - IN CONFIDENCE* *Date: *30 January 2026 at 12:05:32 GMT *To: *Stephen Pattison <stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com>
Dear Stephen CONFIDENTIAL Thank you for your note, I’m glad you contacted me. I’d like to put your mind at rest regarding TechWorks continued commitment to IOTSF and to serving its membership in the best possible way. It would not be appropriate for me to discuss the circumstances around John’s exit from the organisation, but I regret the unfortunate way this has been messaged to the IOTSF Steering Board. I can reassure you that TechWorks is financially stable and being actively managed to remain so. In common with all other trade associations, we are operating in a challenging economic environment and need to remain sharp, competitive, and fully engaged with the different communities which form our foundation. After reflecting on events and developments over the past year, I am making some leadership changes designed to improve efficiency of the organisation. I’d be more than happy to take you through once complete. As Executive Chair of TechWorks (and company director), I am taking personal accountability for management and support of the leadership team as we make these changes, which will strengthen the company’s ability to execute its mission and deliver meaningful value to our entire membership. I fully agree with the need for well structured, well thought through comms regarding John’s departure. This is being addressed as a matter of urgency. In the meantime, I’d personally appreciate your support in handling this matter with discretion – I recognise the unnecessary damage it may cause if handled poorly. John has been an outstanding asset to the organisation over many years and commands tremendous respect. I’d be very happy to discuss further if you’d like to have a call next week. Kind regards, Luke +44 7775 683111 *From:*Stephen Pattison <stephen.d.pattison@icloud.com> *Sent:*29 January 2026 16:06 *To:*Luke Ibbetson, Vodafone <luke.ibbetson@vodafone.com> *Subject:*Techworks/IOTSF
You don't often get email fromstephen.d.pattison@icloud.com.Learn why this is important <https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification>
*External Email:*Don’t click links or open attachments unless you trust the sender. Unsure? Please use the*_Report button_*.
Dear Luke,
I am writing on behalf of the members of the IOTSF Steering Board about recent developments at Techworks and how they impact the work of IOTSF.
At our meeting on 28 January, John Moor announced he would be leaving IOTSF and Techworks in order primarily to relieve the sudden financial pressures on Techworks. All of the Board Members were shocked and disappointed. John’s role in IOTSF has been crucial to its success for many years.
A number of questions arise:
- How has this disastrous situation come about? Why wasn’t the financial position of Techworks monitored by the Board more closely and more competently? - The decision to release John casts doubt on the Techwork Board’s commitment to IOTSF and its work going forward. How can IOTSF members be assured of Techworks’s continued support of it? And of much better financial management in the future?
In our discussion members stressed the unique value IOTSF provides as a forum for bringing together industrial, commercial, academic, regulatory and policy viewpoints. We strongly believe there is a demand for an organisation like this, whether as part of Techworks or not.
Apart from the fundamental questions above, the Board is worried about the public handling of John’s departure and its significance. There is a risk that members may leave the organisation if this is not done carefully. We need as a minimum a well thought out comms strategy.
The Board would welcome a session with you in the next couple of weeks to hear your views on these issues and discuss them with you.
Many Thanks Stephen Stephen Pattison Chair IOTSF ESB
C2 General
_______________________________________________ ESB mailing list -- esb@iotsfmm.org To unsubscribe send an email to esb-leave@iotsfmm.org
--
Nick Allott
CEO nquiringminds
Visiting Professor University of Southampton
BSc. PhD. FBCS, FIAP. FRSA
+44 (0) 7714145711 | nick@nqminds.com | skype: nallott | @nqminds
Engineering Centre, University Pkwy, Southampton SO16 7PT
Company Number: 7452630, VAT No: 103 0537 70 www.nqminds.com <http://www.nqminds.com>
_______________________________________________ ESB mailing list --esb@iotsfmm.org To unsubscribe send an email toesb-leave@iotsfmm.org
participants (5)
-
John Moor -
Nick Allott -
Richard Marshall -
sarb＠virtuallyinformed.com -
Stephen Pattison